Friedman & Ranzenhofer, P.C., founded in Akron by Fred Friedman on July
14, 1955, has grown to four attorneys working in five offices throughout
Western New York. Although the firm has embraced the latest technology,
it still provides small town service. The firm guarantees cost effective
services delivered in a timely manner. The firm's Legalsurvival.com web site,
which was established in 1996, was one of the first law firm web sites on
the Internet. Offices are located in Akron, Batavia, Buffalo, Clarence/Williamsville,
and West Seneca. Attorneys Michael H. Ranzenhofer, Robert Friedman, Elizabeth
DiPirro, and Fred Friedman handle a wide variety of legal matters. As
family attorneys, they handle personal injury, estate planning/elder law,
real estate, probate and estate administration, criminal/traffic, marital and
family law, and bankruptcy. As business attorneys, they provide corporate
and business advice, debt collection and representation regarding commercial
and investment real estate.
[top of page]
Landlord Seminar
"How to Survive Legally as a Landlord" will be presented by
attorney/author Robert Friedman from 6:00 to 9:30 p.m. on Tuesday,
February 6, 2001 at Clarence Middle School, 10150 Greiner Road,
Clarence, New York. Mr. Friedman will discuss evictions, leases, Small Claims
Court, discrimination laws, civil liability, insurance, security deposits,
elderly tenants, drug, debt collection and lead paint regulations. There is
a registration and book fee. To register, call (716) 759-8331.
[top of page]
What's New in Consumer Law?
Used car dealer must pay $342,385 for selling a rebuilt wreck. A
used car dealer sold the Plaintiff a 1984 GMC Jimmy telling her that it
was "in perfect condition, never wrecked and a one-owner trade-in". Actually,
the vehicle had been totaled and rebuilt, had several previous owners and
had a lurking engine and other problems. Immediately after purchasing the
truck, the Plaintiff began having problems starting it. Three days later,
the fuel pump had to be replaced and a cylinder gasket blew one week later. The
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, upheld $210,000 in punitive damages,
$125,000 in attorneys fees and $7,835 in compensatory damages.
[top of page]
What's New in Real Estate Law?
Real estate agents do not have to disclose sex offenders. Home
buyers sued their real estate agents for failing to inform them that a
convicted child molester lived across the street from their new home. The
agents claimed that they did not know a sex offender lived in the neighborhood
at the time of the sale. The buyers argued that this information should
have been disclosed because the presence of a sex offender influences the
value of their property. However, the New York court ruled that even if
the real estate agents did know, they were not obligated to disclose
information regarding neighbors. State law requires brokers and
homeowners to tell prospective buyers only about known physical defects.
[top of page]
What's New in Tax Law?
Tax relief for "innocent spouses". Innocent spouses can
get "equitable relief" from the IRS where their spouse failed to pay taxes
if: (1) a joint return was filed; (2) no other type of relief was
available; (3) the tax is still unpaid at the time relief is requested;
(4) he or she is not part of a fraudulent scheme to transfer assets; and
(5) the request is made no later than two years after the first collection
activity. Relief will be granted if the taxpayer did not know or have
reason to know the tax had not been paid and paying the tax would cause
"economic hardship".
[top of page]
What's New in Personal Injury Law?
Psychological injury is covered by auto insurance. A
driver who was hit by a rental car claimed that the accident caused him
"serious" injuries, including a lower back sprain, right ankle sprain and
various psychological injuries. The rental company argued that
psychological problems cannot be deemed "serious" because psychologists
cannot make medical determinations. However, the New York court
determined that "an emotional or psychological injury can be a basis for
the finding of a 'serious injury' under the no-fault statute...A
determination by a qualified psychologist, in an action resulting from an
automobile accident, that an individual has been emotionally disabled for
the statutory minimum time, should be admissible evidence of a 'serious
injury'".
[top of page]
What's New in Small Business Law?
U.S. Supreme Court holds that the ADA does not cover those with
correctable impairments. The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuits brought by a Kansas truck
mechanic who was fired for severe hypertension; an Oregon truck driver
who was fired because he sees in only one eye and two female pilots who
were rejected because they need glasses. In all three cases, the court
ruled that the employees had no disability. Because the mechanic's high
blood pressure can be controlled by medication, he is not "substantially
limited in any major life activity". Although he could not function
without medication, "Congress did not intend to bring under the statute's
protection all those whose uncorrected conditions amount to
disabilities". The truck driver was not qualified for his job and,
therefore, not protected by the ADA—because he failed to meet the minimum
Department of Transportation Vision Standards.
[top of page]
What's New in DWI/Traffic Law?
Police may take drunk driver's blood despite fear of needles. A
police officer gave a drunk driver a blood test, even though he objected
because of his fear of needles and contracting HIV. The Wisconsin Court
of Appeals held that the test results cannot be suppressed because his
objection was "unreasonable". A police officer is not required to
consider a lawfully arrested suspect's request for an alternative
test. Absent a reasonable objection, the officer has the authority to use
a reasonable procedure in drawing blood. The court ruled that "As a
practicable matter, the driver provides no objective basis for fearing
that he could contract HIV while having his blood drawn...He does not
dispute that his blood was drawn in a hospital under medically accepted
standards.
[top of page]
What's New in Debtor/Creditor Law?
Debtor must pay reasonable legal fees of 15 percent. Plaintiff
sued Defendants for goods sold and delivered and counsel fees based on a
personal guarantee. The Plaintiff's attorney was successful in obtaining
the full amount owed. The court conducted a hearing on attorney's fees. The
Plaintiff contended that the Defendants owed reasonable fees of $34,487,
which was 15 percent of the amount owed to the Plaintiff. The Defendants
claimed that this amount was unreasonable in light of the limited legal
work performed, which consisted of correspondence, a complaint and a
motion. The New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County, ruled for the
Plaintiff, noting the success of it's attorney and that the agreement was
freely entered into between businessmen.
[top of page]
What's New in Health Law?
Father not liable for daughter's abortion. A hospital
sought to recover medical fees for an abortion performed on a 20-year-old
woman by naming her father as co-Defendant. The woman alone had requested
the medical services and guaranteed to pay for them. The Bronx New York
Civil Court ruled that only the daughter was liable for the fees because
the Family Court Act does not impose an absolute duty on a parent to
provide for medical expenses of a child under the age of 21. In order for
the parent to be liable, the services must have been medically necessary,
not optional or elective in nature.
[top of page]
What's New in Divorce/Family Law?
Wife entitled to interim attorney's fees. A party to a
divorce who has finite assets and a small income is not required to spend
down a substantial portion of those assets in order to qualify for an
award of interim attorney’s fees where her spouse appears to have much
more extensive assets and income, with an ability to conduct legal battles
over any contested issue. This holds especially true if, in addition,
there are indications that the spouse with the financial clout, may intend
to assert his will over such issues as the children’s care and custody,
prepared to take unilateral action and to conduct a legal battle if his
wife disagrees. Given the large discrepancy in the parties’ respective
incomes and assets at their disposal, as well as the nature of the issues
in dispute, concerning child support and custody, the New York Appellate
Division, First Department, concluded that it was an improvident exercise
of discretion to deny the wife’s application for an award of interim
counsel fees on the ground that she is financially able to meet the cost
herself.
[top of page]
What's New in Landlord/Tenant Law?
College may deny housing to gay couples. A college of
medicine may deny gay couples housing that is provided for married
students without violating New York State’s anti-discrimination laws. Two
students sought university apartments, which rent at below market levels,
for themselves and their partners. Both couples had registered with the
City Clerk as domestic partners. The medical school, however, denied both
couples apartments because they were unmarried. The New York Appellate
Division, First Department, determined that the New York statute that
confers rights to roommates did not apply to students because it only
protects a "primary residence". The court also found no violation of the
prohibition on sexual orientation discrimination in the New York City
Human Rights Law because there was no showing of a disparate impact on
homosexuals.
[top of page]
What's New in Estate Planning/Elder Law?
Trust funds must be used to repay Social Services. The
Commissioner of Social Services sued to recover Medicaid funds expended
for home care and institutional care for the wife of the Defendant over a
six-year period. The Defendant transferred assets to an irrevocable
trust three years prior to the application for Medicaid benefits. The
trust agreement provided that the trustees were empowered to make
distributions to the grantor, from income and principal, as the trustees
deemed necessary to support the grantor’s standard of living. The New
York Supreme Court, Tompkins County, concluded that the entire corpus of
the trust was available to the Defendant for the benefit of his wife and
that the Defendant was bound by the statutory implied contract of Social
Services Law to provide necessary care and assistance to his spouse.
[top of page]
Injured Victims' Rights
The Friedman & Ranzenhofer, P.C. Ten Point Pledge to Accident/Injury Clients is:
- To communicate with you in plain language that is easy to understand.
- To promptly return your telephone calls.
- To quickly and thoroughly investigate and analyze your case. Friedman & Ranzenhofer, P.C. does not accept every accident case.
- To have your case personally handled by an attorney.
- To keep you informed of the progress of your case at all times.
- To show you the personal care, concern and attention which has been the hallmark of our law firm since 1955.
- To not handle your case in an "assembly line" fashion.
- To accommodate the needs of you and your family during the handling of your case.
- To vigorously protect your legal rights.
- To never release your name to the media after your case has been completed, except with your written permission.
Attorney Michael H. Ranzenhofer limits his practice to automobile accident, slip and fall, dog bite and defective product cases. He is a member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, the Western New York Trial Lawyers Association, the New York State Trial Lawyers Association and the Erie County Bar Association Negligence Committee.
[top of page]
